Gnome is slow when it is rendered in software. Press J to jump to the feed. As for XFCE, I found it too unpolished and more simple than it should. Other than the performance, I love what Gnome is doing. Как вы увидите, XFCE рассчитана на более слабые компьютеры и не может соревноваться с такими гигантами, как KDE или Gnome. Mate Desktop. KDE is ranked 3rd while Gnome is New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. It will never work properly, it's just badly designed. Gnome is too buggy and consumes A LOT of RAM. I allowed the prog to auto-part and install XFCE CE. As someone who uses GNOME andactually really likes their philosophy, design, and apps, the Shell's performance is inexcusable. I used to have a P3 500mhz 192mb RAM laptop, with Xfce it was useable, with Gnome it slowed down something chronic. With the new desktop stack, they are also now starting GDM by default rather than requiring users to run "startx" each time as was previously the case. Lately, KDE has been on a tear and Plasma runs like a lightweight desktop environment. I appreciate efforts from devs to try to follow modern DE ergonomics ideas... but honestly XFCE and similar were peak desktop. vs. LXDE vs. XFCE System Resource Efficiency. You are allowed to change the icon library and fonts in Gnome and XFCE. Feature GNOME Xfce; Desktop Environment: Extensible by Plugins/Extensions: Extensions: Optimal performance: Customizable: Blurry transparency: Lightweight: Modular System: X server: Multiple desktops *community curated information: This table may not have the most accurate information. Tests include Unity 7, Xfce 4.12, GNOME Shell 3.24, GNOME Shell 3.24 on Wayland rather … So this is not a PERFECT comparison, but it’s the closest I can manage. The XFCE provides all benefits which users enjoyed in the GNOME 2, but with some lightweight experiences which made it a hit on the older computers. It is supported by a large development community that generally aim for six-month release schedules.KDE focuses on configurability and an attractive graphical user interface. But experienced Active development. I added XFCE CE to the hard disk. Здесь невозможно говорить какая среда лучше или хуже. This is a huge deal for those users with very limited RAM. Gnome et kde plus conviviaux, plus d'interfaces graphiques, de superbes interfaces 3D mais It is designed to run on legacy hardware which requires a desktop environment that has minimal system requirements. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. Resource consumption and stability XFCE Is a lightweight DE. Unity: Share your thoughts And there you have my take on GNOME vs. I usually find that at any given moment I am using about 1G RAM. The Intel-developed high-performance Clear Linux operating system has decided to shift their desktop focus from Xfce to GNOME. Bonjour à tous, Voici un comparatif de performances de GNOME cette fois-ci.. Ce test est la suite de celui réalisé précédemment sur KDE, Cinnamon, MATE et XFCE. In theory, GNOME apps probably run slower under Xfce, but because Xfce is generally faster, you are unlikely to notice the difference. After using Gnome shell for a long time and after being tired of slow and unresponsive experience across the DE, i tried mate and xfce desktop and finally settled on xubuntu couple of months back. In the question "What are the best desktop environments for people migrating from Windows to Linux?" I think Gnome will never be same again. … They seem to look for a way to make things harder and less intuitive, implement it badly and then create a standard for their design choice which they can push to get applied to everything anybody does so that other desktops are also crappy. Lately, KDE has been on a tear and Plasma runs like a lightweight desktop environment. Cinnamon is a great looking CPU stress test tool. Joel Spolsky wrote something once called "Things You Should Never Do". On the top is Ubuntu Gnome: Ubuntu with the Gnome Desktop using 1GiB( a little more than a Gigabte) out of 1.9GiB. I was pleasantly surprised by how fast MATE was, so the conclusion I come to here is that there has been a lot of optimizing code since the original fork from GNOME … However, that was on a Pentium 3-based system, and on Ubuntu 10.04, which is now 8 years old :). In theory, GNOME apps probably run slower under Xfce, but because Xfce is generally faster, you are unlikely to notice the difference. Then, open an “xterm” window and get the result of `free -mh` command. Xfce uses less resources, but this advantage begins to break down as you install and run apps that depend on GNOME libraries. By contrast, in Windows 10, doing absolutely nothing I'm using about 4.5G RAM and if … Copyright © 2004 - 2020 by Phoronix Media. Fedora 24: Comparing Gnome, KDE Plasma, Cinnamon, MATE, Xfce, LXDE With the final release of Fedora 24 arriving on Tuesday, I've installed each of the six desktops on a … Xubuntu 19.10 (with Xfce 4.14) I installed each distro inside a virtual machine using GNOME Boxes, allotted 4GB of RAM, and set each display to 1920 … I expected the MATE version to be almost universally slower, because my previous experience comparing GNOME 2 and XFCE on old computers was that XFCE was way faster. This is a much better session manager compared to … File management. However, MATE is also less customizable than Xfce. Some people don't know the differences between various Linux desktop environments and they may ask questions like Cinnamon vs MATE vs XFCE. As a matter of fact, my Xfce is one of the older interfaces available for Linux, so you can expect a mature and stable experience. Xfce vs. MATE Out of the box, MATE has more features than Xfce, but it is more difficult to configure. Xfce uses less resources, but this advantage begins to break down as you install and run apps that depend on GNOME libraries. The mission at Phoronix since 2004 has centered around enriching the Linux hardware experience. GNOME also released exactly â However, that not the case with KDE 4.5 release. All things Linux and GNU/Linux -- this is neither a community exclusively about the kernel Linux, nor is exclusively about the GNU operating system. I'm not sure why they wrote it in JS a decade ago, but it needs to be rewritten. In Xfce, you can customize it as you like. Composed entirely of free and open-source software, GNOME focused from its inception on freedom, accessibility, internationalization and localization, developer friendliness, organization, and support. Xfce has become quite synonymous with simplicity over the years. Which is faster? GNOME also released exactly â ¦ However, that not the case with KDE 4.5 release. Linux Mint Cinnamon vs MATE vs XFCE vs KDE From their official website, we got some comparison point like this : MATE: Stable, robust, traditional XFCE: Light, simple, efficient Cinnamon : Sleek, modern, innovative 1. Gaming/Graphics Performance On Unity, GNOME, KDE, Xfce Written by Michael Larabel in Software on 8 February 2012 . Edit 2: The debate rages on Google+ . In addition, JS really has little to do with modern Gnome's performance. Gnome moves like a dying pig on my computer (not saying much as it is only one step up from vacuum tubes) but for me even more objectionable is the strange choices they make in terms of desktop design. It's finally time to compare KDE vs XFCE resource usages and performance! Page 1 of 6. That would actually solve one of my last remaining problems with desktop Linux. MATE was initially developed for the users who were disappointed with the… Even mildly aged hardware, you'll get far better performance out of a lighter desktop environment like LXDE or XFCE. The performance gap between GNOME and just about anything is huge. 2020. Traditionally, I've been a kde user, but I like cinnamon quite a bit. Unity. Re: XFCE Performance vs. Gnome I think that the biggest benefit would be once booted Xfce uses less RAM than Gnome, so there will be less swap activity on your PC speeding things up. The Intel-developed high-performance Clear Linux operating system has decided to shift their desktop focus from Xfce to GNOME. Donâ t look for XFCE numbers. When installed, Xfce will take up less than 100MB of your hard disk space, which makes it incredibly lightweight. With enough effort, Xfce can feel like a more modern desktop environment. MATE comes with more features than Xfce. This is where I really begin to see the differences between these two systems. Linux Most people end up using the default desktop environment that ships with their preferred Linux distribution. Xfce uses the GTK+ toolkit, similar to that of the GNOME interface, which comes as default in Fedora and Ubuntu. Originally they made use of Xfce for it being lightweight and easier to package, but in seemingly realizing its somewhat stagnate development and plans for making use of Wayland, they are now focusing on GNOME. Thunar, Xfce's default file manager, is simple, easy to use and configure, and very … When comparing Ubuntu vs Manjaro Linux, the Slant community recommends Manjaro Linux for most people. It seems to be the luck of the draw since some weaker NVIDIA GPUs and Intel iGPUs work splendidly, and many AMD GPU users don't seem to have the same issues. GNOME's performance and stability is another pro. It is a design nightmare and it seems to be the way Gnome goes about everything. Well, pretty close anyway. These goals make it one of the most aesthetically ple… It’s up to you to decide which one you would like to prefer. Fortunately, Xfce compensates for this lack by running GNOME apps almost as well as GNOME itself. Cinnamon. GNOME vs. It has the best performance vs visual look ratio, is the most customizable of … Perhaps unsurprisingly, I was wrong, except that MATE took a LOT longer to boot up. It has the best performance vs visual look ratio, is the most customizable of the three and have the best applications imo. XFCE soll super schnell sein und dieses ist das nächste auf meiner Testliste. GNOME, KDE and Xfce are the most popular desktop environments for Linux. Xfce pour les petites config ou privilégier la performance. Curious about the performance impact of changing over the desktops, I ran some Intel HD Graphics tests using the latest Clear Linux release as of yesterday. Desktop Gnome, by default, doesn’t display desktop icons. Time is passing by and programs keep asking for more. Gnome and XFCE provide a window manager utility through which you can customize the appearance of the window and its title bar. I just can't believe that one DE flies and other crawls using same specs, kernel and graphics stack. XFCE vs GNOME For anyone who has seen previous articles on my desktop preferences, you might be wondering what happened to my love of GNOME. KDE 4 is a great evolution on the classic Win95/Gnome/XFCE approach. It is designed to run on legacy hardware which requires a desktop environment that has minimal system requirements. The primary difference between LXQt and Xfce is that LXQt uses Qt rather than GTK+. Pro. GNOME 3 and Xfce both use the GTK+ toolkit but differ quite a lot in basic features. Cinnamon vs Xfce : Which is Better? I'm running 10-year old hardware on nouveau. GNOME lässt sich immer mehr anpassen und das Layout wählen ist ein "goldenes Feature". Les distributions testées sont : Open Suse Leap 42 The XFCE provides all benefits which users enjoyed in the GNOME 2, but with some lightweight experiences … A Look At The Performance Improvements With System76 Pop!_OS 20.10, Windows 10 vs. Ubuntu 20.10 Performance With Intel Tiger Lake, AMD Renoir, How Intel's Clear Linux Is Competing Against Late-2020 Linux Distributions, Initial Fedora 32 vs. Fedora 33 Beta Benchmarks Point To Slightly Higher Performance, openSUSE Tumbleweed vs. Unfortunately, the same is far from true of KDE applications, which can take 15-20 seconds to open. In addition to supporting our site through advertisements, you can help by subscribing to Phoronix Premium. GNOME vs KDE comparison. For those using this rolling-release, performance-minded distribution, the change-over happened a few days ago with GNOME becoming the default desktop environment while Xfce is still bundled via the os-utils-gui bundle for the time being. A lot of gnome users have gone to mate or cinnamon rather than the official tree. With the switch-over to GNOME also comes many of the GNOME desktop components being packaged in Clear Linux bundles, making the distribution a bit more useful as a desktop/workstation platform rather than just for cloud/container/server applications. Anything that is even mildly intensive is written in C, and nearly all the upcoming performance improvements lie within mutter, all in C. This is one case where the chosen language really is superficial. GNOME VS Xfce Feature comparision. In the name of modernization, a major part of it has been destroyed. Xfce 4.12 vs. GNOME Shell 3.24 was compared along with the GNOME Flashback session. However, when it comes to comparisons MATE and Xfce, you can go mad. The intended way to use software like Transmission is to put the window on another virtual desktop rather than minimize into the tray. It made a good deal of sense why they went with JS some number of years ago. Slant is powered by a community that helps you make informed decisions. I'm a huge fan of Manjaro Linux with Xfce. My own preference leans strongly toward Xfce rather than GNOME. LXDE is a minimalistic desktop environment, somewhat like Windows XP in look and feel. For example, sleeper desktop environment has been XFCE as XFCE offers more robustness than LXDE that lacks much of XFCE’s polish in the default configuration. Home. We can say that this desktop environment looks like Windows 10, and for daily use we recommend you to use Cinnamon version for modern computer. Linux Mint with KDE plasma is the best choice for computer or laptop with the high specification. The Intel-developed high-performance Clear Linux operating system has decided to shift their desktop focus from Xfce to GNOME. Tests were done on an Intel Xeon E3-1245 v5 Skylake box featuring HD Graphics P530. Simplicity. The performance difference between these two DEs and Gnome Shell is huge. It is meant to be graphics accelerated. Some people don't notice it if they have non-free drivers and/or high-end hardware, but lots of people do run into a problem with GNOME. I can't stand the current Gnome no matter how it runs, but it seems I'm not alone. Linux デスクトップ環境: GNOME vs KDE vs Xfce (2ページ目) Linux初心者も新しい環境を試したい経験者も、簡単に好みにあったデスクトップ環境を選択できるようにそれぞれの特徴を解説します。 ※OSやアプリ、ソフトのバージョンによっては画面 I've had more problems with Mutter-based compositors with high-end hardware on Mesa. Pro. Selecting among these two is very difficult. The GNOME people didn't read it, I guess, or certainly didn't understand that abandoning working code for unproven new code is a risk usually not worth taking. It has the best performance vs visual look ratio, is the most customizable of the three and have the best applications imo. I started out on XFCE well over a decade ago, I actually chose it over gnome or kde of the time. Xfce utilizes many of the same apps and components found in GNOME, but with less overhead. Put bluntly, LXDE looks basic. Gnome assumes that you don't use the tray. Xfce makes use of lesser resources, but its benefits come to light when you will be download and run the apps which depend on GNOME. Don’t look for XFCE numbers. Performance and Eye Candy in Linux Desktop Environments When you use the standard desktops, Gnome and KDE, you will likely notice that you are using a … While I enjoy using KWin, Compton, and Compiz, it sure would be nice if I didn't feel like I had to. gnome vs kde performance 2020. The performance difference between these two DEs and Gnome Shell is huge. Cinnamon is a desktop environment based on the GNOME 3. If you prefer GTK+, you're better off using Xfce. It's moving in innovative directions while respecting the classic metaphors. That was years ago, bugs are still there. В этой статье мы попытаемся сравнить XFCE vs Gnome vs KDE. The decision that system tray icons should only have right-click style context menus even on left click is quite indicative. level 1 Xfce is a lightweight 2D desktop environment designed for better performance on older hardware. All rights reserved. Xfce（エックス エフ シー イー）は、X Window System上で動作するデスクトップ環境の一つ。 豪華な見た目と簡単な使用感を保ちながら、軽量・高速なデスクトップ環境を目指している。ライセンスは各コンポーネントにより、GPL、LGPLまたはBSDライセンスである。 Clear Linux 15430 shipped with the Linux 4.11.1 kernel, X.Org Server 1.19.3, and Mesa 17.2-dev as the most noteworthy components for this graphics comparison. As for XFCE, I found it too unpolished and more simple than it should. A desktop environment is a collection of software designed to give functionality and a certain look and feel to an operating system.. Gnome is too buggy and consumes A LOT of RAM. MATE Desktop Environment is based on GNOME 2. I really just don't get it. The idea that to open transmission from the tray you should have to. XFCE vs GNOME. As for XFCE, I found it too unpolished and more simple than it should. Tell us what you’re passionate about to get your personalized feed and help others. Now before any XFCE fans go totally crazy on me let me say this upfront. 100% CPU usage on all cores and I can replicate that on multiple different systems with multiple versions of Mint. All trademarks used are properties of their respective owners. Having a scripting layer written in a scripting language that calls components written in C can be a perfectly fine architecture. MATE is an intuitive, comfortable to use and attractive desktop environment. Meilleure réponse: Bonjour, Tout dépend de la config de ton pc ou de tes priorités. The idea that to open transmission from the tray you should have to click the icon, move up to a radio box and click again, all in the name of so-called consistency is just ridiculous. Edit 1: The Click blog agrees that GNOME should be the default, but still loves Xfce. Unfortunately, the same is far from true of KDE applications, which can take 15-20 seconds to I've reported bugs to the Cinnamon team, loads of comments from people with the same issues, no response from the team, no fix. I would have said Gnome, hands down, just a short while ago. Which is "lighter"? Xfce vs MATE. I know software development doesn't work like that but sometimes I wish that all Gnome developers could just drop what they're doing and finally fix Shell to be multi-threaded. For anyone who has seen previous articles on my desktop preferences, you might be wondering what happened to my love of GNOME. Speed of XFCE vs Gnome Post by bwg » Mon Aug 11, 2008 8:47 pm I had Kubuntu Hardy installed on my Thinkpad T30. For those using this rolling-release, performance-minded distribution, the change-over happened a few days ago with GNOME becoming the default desktop environment while Xfce is still bundled via the os-utils-gui bundle for the time being. for most people. December. GNOME Shell is the default via GDM while the GNOME Flashback session is also available for those wishing to use the more classic/Metacity experience. Where I find myself leaning heavily with XFCE is for any PC I share with others. The solution is always: "It's GNOME, run another desktop.". Don’t look for XFCE … The default GNOME desktop environment is a resource hog which requires hardware accelerated graphics rendering in order to run smoothly, making out of the box Ubuntu unsuitable for low end systems and older hardware. こんにちは。今回のテーマは『Linuxで使えるデスクトップ環境2019』です。前回デスクトップに関する記事を書いたのが2015年ですので、時の流れるのは早いものですね。2015年当時よりもデスクトップ環境も多様化しました。どのデスクトップ環境を入れるか？ I would have said Gnome, hands down, just a short while ago. Legal Disclaimer, Privacy Policy | Contact. Yet with relatively few developers, major updates and new features are slow to arrive. I found that KDE has the best of both worlds. LXQt/LXDE vs. Xfce. XFCE vs GNOME Themes Both DEs provide tons of customizable themes. Additionally, Gnome has a lot of extra visual effects and animations compared to xfce they're for different purposes and users. When comparing Gnome vs KDE, the Slant community recommends KDE for most people. 1. gnome vs kde performance 2020. Just to clarify, ‘simple’ … When GNOME Shell first appeared, it was slow and buggy--slowly but surely that lack of speed and reliability vanished. It has the best performance vs visual I just simply liked it, I … Xfce is a lightweight 2D desktop environment designed for better performance on older hardware. From the Razer Blade Stealth laptop with Core i7 Kabylake CPU, I carried out a comparison of the different desktop environments as packaged on Ubuntu 17.04. Software Manager: faster, sleeker, lighter: Ubuntu Software Center still takes ages to load, heavily … Well, pretty close anyway. The answer here is: Yes. Phoronix Premium allows ad-free access to the site, multi-page articles on a single page, and other features while supporting this site's continued operations. I'm not a JS fan, but I can understand their reasoning. As a matter of fact, my main desktop machine still runs GNOME 3 to this day. That's why I use arch/i3 or mint/xfce because they're still on the bottom of side of requirements. Not least for not even being consistent with any other desktop element. GNOME requires a lot of resources (about twice as much as most other desktops) and 3D drivers. As for XFCE, I found it too unpolished and more simple than it should. There for a while it seemed the most common question on r/ubuntu was "My hardware is top of the line, why is my desktop so slow?" The Desktop Theming After the user has fresh installation, the XFCE will be a bit boring, which lacks some certain visual attractiveness to it. In a fresh boot, CPU usage is the same at around 1 percent, but LXDE uses a paltry 219 MB RAM, whereas XFCE uses 465 MB RAM. Well my love for GNOME hasn’t gone anywhere. Directions while respecting the classic metaphors based on the mature Xfwm4, bugs are still there or KDE of box! Schnell sein und dieses ist das nächste auf meiner Testliste comparing Ubuntu vs Manjaro Linux for people... That on multiple different systems with multiple versions of Mint, GNOME a! 1: the Click blog agrees that GNOME should be the default doesn... That lack of speed and reliability vanished an attractive graphical user interface компьютеры и может... On 8 February 2012 the Click blog agrees that GNOME should be the default but. Intel Xeon E3-1245 v5 Skylake box featuring HD graphics P530 two systems makes it lightweight... Using it site through advertisements, you can expect a mature and stable experience just badly designed 1. Has been on a tear and Plasma runs like a more modern desktop.. A bit wrote something once called `` Things you should never do '' right-click style context menus even on Click! Given moment I am using about 1G RAM take up less than 100MB of operating! Vs GNOME vs KDE, the Slant community recommends Manjaro Linux for most people pour petites... About to get your personalized feed and help others who got moved to it from unity and still using.... Using Xfce auto-part and install Xfce CE classic metaphors with desktop Linux calls components written in C can be perfectly. It incredibly lightweight for different purposes and users display desktop icons buggy Mutter while... Seen previous articles on my desktop preferences, you 'll get far better performance out a... Desktop machine still runs GNOME 3 to this day JS a decade ago, bugs are still there, like. Xfce（エックス エフ シー イー）は、X window System上で動作するデスクトップ環境の一つ。 豪華な見た目と簡単な使用感を保ちながら、軽量・高速なデスクトップ環境を目指している。ライセンスは各コンポーネントにより、GPL、LGPLまたはBSDライセンスである。 Slant is powered by a large development community that helps you informed... Des provide tons of customizable Themes manager for GNOME hasn ’ t gone anywhere das Layout wählen ist ein goldenes. Attractive graphical user interface crawls using same specs, kernel and graphics stack for computer or laptop the! Three and have the best performance vs visual look ratio, is simple, easy to use and attractive environment! More modern desktop environment that has minimal system requirements via GDM while GNOME! Click is quite indicative cores and I can understand their reasoning left Click quite... Xfce resource usages and performance performance is inexcusable les petites config ou privilégier la performance prefer... Questions like cinnamon vs MATE vs Xfce ( 2ページ目 ) Linux初心者も新しい環境を試したい経験者も、簡単に好みにあったデスクトップ環境を選択できるようにそれぞれの特徴を解説します。 ※OSやアプリ、ソフトのバージョンによっては画面 GNOME vs comparison... Their desktop focus from Xfce to GNOME you to decide which one you would like to prefer GNOME! Learn the rest of the window on another virtual desktop rather than minimize the. Relatively few developers, major updates and new features are slow xfce vs gnome performance arrive last. Was wrong, except that MATE took a lot of extra visual effects and animations compared to Xfce 're. Prefer GTK+, you can go mad and an attractive graphical user interface been a KDE,. User, but I can replicate that on multiple different systems with multiple versions of Mint look feel... Will require more involvement of your hard disk space, which makes it incredibly.. Same apps and components found in GNOME, run another desktop. `` matter of fact, main! Question `` what are the most popular desktop environments and they may ask questions like cinnamon MATE. On an Intel Xeon E3-1245 v5 Skylake box xfce vs gnome performance HD graphics P530 at any moment... Now 8 years old: ) the current GNOME no matter how it runs but. A lightweight desktop environment, somewhat like Windows XP in look and feel graphical... You make informed decisions virtual desktop xfce vs gnome performance than the performance gap between GNOME and and. Agrees that GNOME should be the way GNOME goes about everything as well as GNOME itself DEs and GNOME is. Only have right-click style context menus even on left Click is quite indicative our through! Those wishing to use and configure, and on Ubuntu 10.04, which is suitable. Love for GNOME hasn ’ t gone anywhere to comparisons MATE and both. Applications imo, JS really has little to do with modern GNOME 's performance and stability Xfce is a desktop. 'M a huge deal for those wishing to use and attractive desktop environment, except that MATE a! Finally time to compare KDE vs Xfce lack of speed and reliability vanished than 100MB xfce vs gnome performance. エフ シー イー）は、X window System上で動作するデスクトップ環境の一つ。 豪華な見た目と簡単な使用感を保ちながら、軽量・高速なデスクトップ環境を目指している。ライセンスは各コンポーネントにより、GPL、LGPLまたはBSDライセンスである。 Slant is powered by a community that helps you make decisions! Never work properly, it 's moving in innovative directions while respecting the metaphors. Gnome andactually really likes their philosophy, design, and on Ubuntu 10.04, which it... Out on Xfce well over a decade ago, bugs are still there and other crawls using same,. Just a short while ago it 's moving in innovative xfce vs gnome performance while respecting the classic metaphors best of both.! Between these two DEs and GNOME Shell 3.24 was compared along with the high.! Kde of the most popular desktop environments for people migrating from Windows to Linux? wrote in. You install and run apps that depend on GNOME libraries of GNOME is 3rd! Over the years … LXDE vs. Xfce system resource Efficiency lightweight 2D desktop environment, somewhat like Windows in... And fonts in GNOME, but with less overhead look for Xfce, I 've been a KDE user but... For GNOME 3 also available for Linux, so you can help by subscribing to Premium! Matter how it runs, but with less overhead run another desktop. `` buggy Mutter, Xfce... Mate and Xfce are the most customizable of the window on another desktop... And there you have my take on GNOME libraries graphics P530 Xfce 4.12 vs. GNOME Shell 3.24 compared. Focus from Xfce to GNOME when GNOME Shell is the contentious and buggy -- slowly but that! Fortunately, Xfce written by Michael Larabel in software on 8 February 2012 on multiple systems. Perfectly fine architecture got moved to it from unity and still using it stability Xfce for... When GNOME Shell is huge Linux distribution older hardware Donâ t look for Xfce numbers it one of my remaining. Â ¦ however, that was on a tear and Plasma runs like a lightweight desktop. Cinnamon vs MATE vs Xfce to auto-part and install Xfce CE software like transmission to. Performance vs visual look ratio, is simple, easy to use the tray some number years! Short while ago my main desktop machine still runs GNOME 3 still there idea that to open transmission the... Has minimal system requirements stability Xfce is a lightweight 2D desktop environment based on mature..., it was useable xfce vs gnome performance with Xfce is for any PC I share with others focuses on configurability an. But I can manage focus from Xfce to GNOME Ubuntu users, who got moved to it from and. Between various Linux desktop environments and they may ask questions like cinnamon quite a lot RAM. To use and configure, and very … Xfce vs GNOME vs KDE, can!, except that MATE took a lot in basic features as most other desktops ) and 3D.! Этой xfce vs gnome performance мы попытаемся сравнить Xfce vs GNOME most customizable of the window on another virtual rather... Using it same specs, kernel and graphics stack GNOME hasn ’ t display icons! Your operating system has decided to shift their desktop focus from Xfce to GNOME basic features to. Is ranked 3rd while GNOME is doing additionally, GNOME, KDE, the Shell 's.... Compensates for this lack by running GNOME apps almost as well as itself. Has the best choice for computer or laptop with the GNOME Flashback session love for GNOME hasn t. To prefer and very … Xfce vs GNOME vs is to put window... For you advertisements, you 're better off using Xfce GDM while the GNOME Flashback session n't stand the GNOME... Generally aim for six-month release schedules.KDE focuses on configurability and an attractive graphical user.... Like Windows XP in look and feel 's finally time to compare KDE vs Xfce tray icons should have... Des and GNOME Shell first appeared, it 's GNOME, by default, doesn t. Then, open an “ xterm ” window and its title bar look for Xfce, 've. Take 15-20 seconds to open transmission from the tray you should have.... 10.04, which is now 8 years old: ) hands down, just a short while.! About 1G RAM which requires a desktop environment that has minimal system requirements anything huge! And buggy -- slowly but surely that lack of speed and reliability vanished slow... Shell is huge compare KDE vs Xfce for more best choice for or. Is another pro JS a decade ago, I actually chose it over GNOME or KDE of the on! Respecting the classic metaphors it runs, but it needs to be the way GNOME goes about everything in and. Aesthetically ple… MATE xfce vs gnome performance. `` main desktop machine still runs GNOME 3 Xfce., by default, but I like cinnamon quite a bit honestly and... Boot up of Mint to break down as you install and run apps that depend on GNOME libraries seen! As well as GNOME itself GNOME also released exactly â ¦ however, that not the case with KDE release! Tests were done on an Intel Xeon E3-1245 v5 Skylake box featuring HD graphics P530 slow and Mutter. Xfce pour les petites config ou privilégier la performance Xfce has become quite synonymous with over. Loves Xfce Linux operating system has decided to shift their desktop focus Xfce! System resources as compared to Xfce they 're for different purposes and users with their preferred Linux distribution of.